Establishing a Systematic Prevention and Control System for Laundry Accidents in Laundromat

In the daily operation of the laundromat, every wash comes with responsibility and risk for the clothes. An accident involving high-end clothes costs economic compensation, and it damages the professional reputation of the laundry shop. An accident does not result from one factor. It is the result of process loopholes, technical misjudgments, and communication breaks. This article will systematically analyze ten common causes of laundry accidents and discuss how to turn the risk control from passive remediation to active defense through process optimization and empowerment by professional equipment.

Process Accidents

Such accidents are from loopholes in process control at the front, middle, and back ends. They have nothing to do with technology but have a huge impact.

  • Loss accidents

It is due to the disruption of information flow. Every minor negligence may cause untraceable, mysterious accidents:

The registration of the number when customers enter the shop is wrong.

The characteristics of the clothes do not match the laundry list.

When packaging and bagging after washing, two pieces were mistakenly regarded as one

– Solution

Strictly obey the system of dual verification and full-process traceability.

Replace manual operations with information systems (code scanning).

Set up inspection checkpoints at critical stages: item receipt, sorting, and post-wash finishing.

  • Missed Inspection Accidents

It is a high-incidence area for customer complaints. Laundries often face passivity when customers deny pre-existing defects because they have no evidence. The costs of missed inspections are big: cigarette burns, moth damage at receipt, and loose accessories overlooked before washing.

– Solution

Do a full inspection under lighting (professional garment inspection lamps).

Take high-definition photos of defective areas for archiving, and input them into the system along with the laundry slip.

Let customers confirm and sign off on-site.

laundromat service

  • Internal-External Coordination Accidents

Typical scenario is disconnecting between promises and execution:

The front desk staff promises complete stain removal, but laundry technicians discover the stain is special and may damage the fabric.

A customer requests dry cleaning, but a technical assessment suggests wet cleaning.

– Solution

Establish a communication mechanism between the front desk and the back office.

For special clothes, front desk staff must document customer descriptions, observations, and potential risks on the work order.

If technicians identify new issues or execution difficulties, they must pause operations and provide feedback immediately.

Form a closed-loop process of inspection-communication-confirmation.

Technical Accidents

This is a core test of a laundry shop’s professional technologies, especially in today’s world, when the complexity grows.

  • Improper Operation Accidents

The most direct technical errors are:

Water-wash the clothes that should have been dry-cleaned.

Dry the clothes that cannot be dried in a dryer with high temperature.

These are due to the insufficient knowledge of fabrics’ characteristics: the felting tendency of wool, silk’s sensitivity to alkalis, and the intolerance of coated fabrics to high heat.

– Solution

The fundamental solution is strengthened training and the use of equipment to reduce the risk caused by manual determination.

The Kingstar SHS-2025P washing machine has pre-set programs, like wool, silk, and hardshell jackets. These programs are the optimization and integration of temperature, mechanical action, and spinning speed instead of a simple combination of time. Operators only need to correctly identify the fabrics and avoid the wrong operations caused by insufficient experience with the auxiliary help of equipment.

  • Mixed Fabric Compatibility Accidents

This is the hardest challenge currently. Clothes may have multiple materials: natural fibers, synthetic fibers, faux leather, flocking, patchwork leather, and heat-transfer prints. Care labels often only write the main fabric, and other materials are often the accident culprits:

Faux leather becomes brittle after dry cleaning.

Patchwork leather bleeds during wet cleaning.

Flocking peels off.

– Solution

Establish a risk assessment list for composite fabrics and make pre-solutions for common mixed and matched combinations. Also, the Kingstar SHS-2025P wet cleaning machine provides new ideas for treating such complicated fabrics. It uses water as a basic medium, and it can safely treat many patchwork clothes that have high dry cleaning risks (faux leather, coatings) and high water washing risks (silk, wool) with precise control of mechanical forces, spin-stop ratio, mild detergents, and relatively low temperatures. It provides more choices for solving the challenges of mixed materials.

  • Stain Treatment Accidents

Removing oil-based, pigment-based, and protein-based stains needs time and expertise. Wrong use of stain removers or high-temperature processing can easily damage fabrics.

– Solutions

The front desk staff must manage customer expectations by clearly communicating the risks of removing stubborn stains and getting written confirmation.

The back office must obey the principle of “Test First, Treat Later” and test fabric color fastness and stain remover compatibility in inconspicuous areas before full treatment.

  • Systematic Prevention and Control

To systematically reduce accident rates, reinforcement must be done across the three dimensions at the same time.

– Improve the specialty of staff

Do the training of fabrics identification, stain chemistry, and risks precaution, and set the accident cases as the core teaching materials.

– Optimize the rigor of the process

Digitalize and visualize the standard operating procedures.

Set checklists at critical risk points (clothes receipt, sorting, stain removal, washing, and post-wash finishing) to ensure there are no omissions.

– Intelligent guarantee

Let professional laundry equipment be the reliable carrier for the technological implementation and a strong helper of the operators.

The hard objects on clothes (unremoved items and unflattened ornaments) are hazardous sources inside the drum. Kingstar SHS-2025P wet cleaning machines can reduce the risk of clothing scratches and snagging caused by improper or uneven mechanical forces with its optimized design of inner drums, gentle tumbling trajectory, and precise spin-stop ratios. The curled-edge loading port rim keeps the gap between the opening surfaces at 4 to 6mm. In addition, the door uses a convex glass molding design to keep clothes away from the loading opening. This prevents zippers, buttons, or other hardware from getting caught in the door gap and causing damage to clothes.

When faced with the misleading of labels, laundry operators’ experience and judgment are very important. At this time, the editable programs provided by machines are key. Operators can flexibly adjust the water temperature, time, spinning speed, and do a small batch of safe tests on Kingstar SHS-2025P wet cleaning machines to find the best laundry solutions and avoid blindly following the wrong labels.

Also, the best working environment should be created for the quality inspection part.

Wrinkled, tangled clothes can cover potential damage, loose accessories, or little residual stains. This makes thorough inspections impossible. As a result, post-wash finishing is important. The clothes must be taken out promptly and evenly after they are dried according to standards. A good standard of post-wash finishing is making sure every piece of clothes can enter the final quality inspection zone with a status of being smooth. This provides inspectors with a clear, unobstructed view. Minor post-wash issues cannot be hidden. This locks the final quality checkpoint before delivery, and effectively avoids the risk of missed inspections due to disorganized clothes.

Conclusion

The cost of a laundry accident is much higher than the compensation. It is a discount on brand reputation and customer trust.

The core competitiveness of a professional laundry is about stain removal and also establishing a system that can anticipate risks, control processes, and deliver consistent quality. Rigorous process design, ongoing staff training, and reliable equipment are behind this system. They can accurately, consistently, and safely translate professional intentions into laundry results. Kingstar is committed to providing such reliable safeguards for the laundry industry. We work alongside operators to build a firewall against accidents from the source and lay a solid foundation of trust through every detail.

Faites défiler vers le haut